A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between prospective neighbours more than the development of a wall in a coastal web site in a north Dublin suburb, a scenario that has captivated national consideration next an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children property at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental issues, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and the Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek to make their family residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of established citizens. Based on the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their preparing permission by building a wall outside of the boundaries in their site, bringing about an encroachment on a Distinctive Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore parts are subject matter to stringent controls under European and Irish environmental law. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have Long lasting ecological penalties, notably in a sensitive coastal surroundings such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their planning permission, and say the wall, and that is partly developed, is in the right position. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion as an try and delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to maintain their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal planning disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are the two remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic endeavours from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded through waistline-substantial drinking water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Instances, a picture that has given that turn out to be emblematic in the depth with the dispute. These steps weren't basically symbolic; they had been intended to Get Visible proof with the wall’s place relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how The 2 men entered the water during significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm water to photograph the positioning grew to become One of the more putting descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps have been cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into a location affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been coated intimately from the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter if interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical instant during the authorized timeline.
In the Main of your dispute is often a disagreement in excess of boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as manufactured, goes beyond what was authorized and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has long been described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and problems connected into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their action is motivated by problem for environmental defense and adherence to preparing law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving a private check out, insisting instead that it is about guaranteeing that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their extended-standing connection to the area and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair merely seeking to establish a family members residence in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Exclusive Spot of Conservation and say that all will work are already performed determined by professional information and approved programs. Their lawyers have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean during a storm, usually do not change the underlying information.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above development of wall at coastal internet site happens to be a shorthand description for any circumstance that numerous observers see as ever more widespread. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is now extra contentious.
The Irish Moments post about René Collier noted which the businessman experienced previously been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental troubles, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from quite distinctive Expert backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, have become synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site in the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via midsection-large drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Times and René Collier waded through waist-substantial drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both equally the Bodily fact of your coastline as well as the symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these actions shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an too much method.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue on, the result stays uncertain. The court docket must figure out if the wall as designed complies with arranging permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Distinctive Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and setting Paul Feely up disorders. Nevertheless the human aspect remains central: neighbours who will have to Reside together with one another prolonged once the lawful charges are already paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building is effective at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the situation prolong outside of that handle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the importance of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. In addition it underscores how swiftly a local disagreement can escalate when basic issues such as environmental defense and residence legal rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of pure splendor and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre from the dispute stands partly created, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful issues. No matter if it can eventually be altered, eliminated, or done as prepared will depend upon the court docket’s findings. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably go on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin lately.