A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning potential neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated countrywide interest pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building operates at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, where by development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning permission by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their site, bringing about an encroachment on the Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore regions are subject to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have lasting ecological consequences, notably within a delicate coastal ecosystem like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their perspective, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, where by views of the sea are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced during the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Times, a picture which includes because grow to be emblematic on the intensity on the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they had been intended to gather Visible proof with the wall’s situation relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Times described, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became widely searched phrases as readers sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital moment in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as created, goes over and above what was authorized and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their long-standing link to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply looking to build a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out determined by Experienced guidance and accredited designs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of building of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the condition a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier noted which the businessman had Beforehand been involved with regional advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant water for the duration of a storm to René Collier and Paul Feely photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth from the coastline as well as the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing circumstances. Yet the human element continues to be central: neighbours who must Reside alongside one another very long after the lawful expenditures are already paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design will work at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, however the implications of the situation increase over and above that deal with. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental issues for instance environmental protection and residence rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a location of organic beauty and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre on the dispute stands partially developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the long run be altered, removed, or accomplished as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more closely watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.